Mrs. White's Health Visions: From God? Or Dr. Jackson?
Summarized from "The Dansville Days", Prophetess of Health pp. 77-101, by Ronald Numbers. Additional material added by Brother Anderson with sources listed in the citations.
Dr. James Caleb Jackson was born in 1811. Early in his life he worked as a lecturer and publisher of abolitionist newspapers; but he was hampered by extremely poor health. In fact, he was at death's door when he visited a water cure, and his near-miraculous recovery made Jackson a life-long advocate of hydropathy. Later, he obtained a medical degree, and in October of 1858, he moved to Dansville, New York, to open his own water-cure clinic.1
The clinic became known as Our Home on the Hillside, and attained a national reputation. In addition to the water treatments, Dr. Jackson also encouraged his patients to eat properly. No red meat, sugar, coffee, tea, alcohol, or tobacco were permitted at Our Home on the Hillside; instead, the emphasis was on fruits, vegetables, and unprocessed grain. Jackson also promoted a two-meal-a-day diet. Jackson is credited with the invention of the first cold breakfast cereal, a graham-flour-derived recipe he named Granula.2 Dr. Jackson treated his patient with these ten laws of health:3
As the Whites traveled in the mid and late 1860s sharing the health reforms God had supposedly given her by vision, those listeners who happened to be familiar with Dr. Jackson's writings were taken aback by the marked similarities between what Mrs. White claimed to have seen in vision and the teachings of Dr. Jackson. Even Mrs. White acknowledged these striking similarities in a letter to her sons:
"We have here met with a lady who was at Our Home at Dansville when we were there. She introduced me to her husband. They attended our meetings. Your father gave a temperance discourse Sunday morning. She sat with her husband in their carriage just outside the curtains of the tent. They are intelligent people and the first in the place. They invited us to visit them, and today we comply with their request. She made the remark in regard to your father's discourse that it seemed to her she was listening to Dr. Jackson again. She spoke especially of my speaking at the convention, said she had never forgotten it; that it had been a great help to her since that time; that it had especially benefited her."4
Mrs. White defends herself
The fact that Mrs. White's health visions so closely resembled the teachings of Dr. Jackson raised some concern in the church. Mrs. White admits that people "often" questioned her as to whether she got her "vision" from Dr. Jackson. Such a controversy arose that Mrs. White was forced to publicly defend herself in the church's paper:
"Question on the Vision .--Did you receive your views upon health reform before visiting the Health Institute at Dansville, New York, or before you had read works on the subject?
Thus, we have two versions of events:
A closer study of the events will reveal which version is the truth.
The Reform Dress
The Reform Dress incident provides a dramatic illustration of how Mrs. White acquired her "reforms" from other humans and passed these along to the SDA Church with a "Thus saith the Lord." Prior to her visit to the Dansville Institution in 1864, Ellen White had shown little interest in the "reform dress." She felt spending time on dress reform would distract the church from larger issues. In fact, a couple of years earlier she had told the sisters in the Church that God was not interested in the reform dress either:
"God would not have his people adopt the so-called reform dress."6
Can it be any plainer than that? God was not interested whatsoever in the reform dress. In addition, when Sister Carver approached Ellen White with concerns that the SDA Church might adopt the reform dress, Sister White relieved her anxiety, telling her:
"Sister Carver, you need not give yourself the least uneasiness about it. We'll never put it on--we despise it at Battle Creek."7
Despite this assurance, when Mrs. White visited the Dansville clinic she began to see value in the reform dress. Assisting Dr. Jackson at the water cure was his adopted daughter, Dr. Harriet Austin, a fellow hydropathist, who advocated women's dress reform. She was the inventor of the "American Costume", which dispensed with unwieldy floor-length dresses in favor of a mid-length skirt worn over trousers (see picture of Dr. Austin on right).
Mrs. White was sold on the concept of the reform dress, and quickly penned out a testimony indicating God had suddenly changed His mind on the subject:
"God would now have his people adopt the Reform Dress..."8
The Whites soon prevailed upon the SDA sect's leaders to officially adopt the Reform Dress. In 1867, the following was pronounced in the Review:
1. Whereas, The explanations which Bro. and sister White have given of the Reformed Female Dress are consistent, and their reasons for its being healthful, convenient, and modest, are satisfactory; therefore,
Some women dutifully attempted to adopt the awkward dress for a while. After much suffering and humiliation, most soon discarded it. Thus, the Reform Dress was quietly abandoned by the sect.
Question: Who told Ellen White to adopt the reform dress? Was it God or Dr. Austin? To study the subject further, click here.
The Whites visit Dansville
When their son Willie contracted pneumonia in February, 1864, the Whites became seriously interested in health reform. After his recovery, Arthur White explains the Whites' new-found interest in health:
"Now, more than ever, they knew that they must dig deep and learn how to combat disease, and about sound dietetic principles. They determined then and there that at the earliest possible time they must visit the medical institution operated by Dr. Jackson and his associates at Dansville, New York, and gain all they could in practical lines."10
The Whites spent three weeks at the Dansville clinic in September of 1864. Unlike many of the visitors, the Whites were in perfect health. They did not go there because they were feeling ill. On the contrary, they went on a fact-finding mission, to learn first-hand about Dr. Jackson's health teachings. James White wrote:
"In the month of September, 1864, Mrs. White and self spent three weeks at the health institution at Dansville, Livingston County, New York, called 'Our Home.' Our object in this visit was not to take treatment, as we were enjoying better health than usual, but to see what we could see and hear what we could hear, so as to be able to give to many inquiring friends a somewhat definite report."11
The Whites listened to Dr. Jackson lecture, and even attempted to follow some of his dietary reforms. One such attempt at reform failed, however. It was Dr. Jackson's advice to give up salt. Mrs. White explains:
"Many years ago, while at Dr. Jackson's, I undertook to leave it [salt] off entirely, because he advocated this in his lectures."12
On the surface this statement--not released to the public until the 1980s--seems to be of little import, but it is highly significant in that it shows that at least some of the health reforms that later showed up in Mrs. White's testimonies were first learned from Dr. Jackson and not from her visions. While Mrs. White did not give up salt entirely, she did advise her followers that "food should be prepared" without "an undue amount of salt."13
Not only did Dr. Jackson shape the Whites' thinking on health reform, he also seemed to change their thinking on phrenology. Just a couple years earlier Mrs. White denounced it as a tool of Satan.14 However, while at the Dansville clinic, the good doctor read the heads of both the White boys. Mrs. White reports in a private letter:
"I think Dr. Jackson gave an accurate account of the disposition and organization of our children. He pronounces Willie's head to be one of the best that has ever come under his observation. He gave a good description of Edson's character and peculiarities."15
The Whites study Jackson's books and articles
In spite of her three-week fact-finding mission to the Dansville Clinic, Mrs. White assured her followers that others had no influence on her health writings:
"That which I have written in regard to health was not taken from books or papers. As I related the things which I had been shown to others, the question was asked, 'Have you seen the paper, The Laws of Life or the Water Cure Journal?' I told them No, I had not seen either of the papers. Said they, 'What you have seen agrees very much with much of their teachings.' I talked freely with Dr. Lay and many others upon the things which had been shown me in reference to health. I had never seen a paper treating upon health. After the vision was given me, my husband was aroused upon the health question. He obtained books, upon our eastern journey, but I would not read them. My view was clear, and I did not want to read anything until I had fully completed my books. My views were written independent of books or of the opinions of others.16
Notice from this quote:
Here is what Mrs. White wants her followers to believe: God gave her a health reform vision, she wrote it out, and then, to everyone's amazement, the vision "agrees very much" with the teachings of Dr. Jackson, which just so happen to be sitting on a bookshelf in her house. What an amazing coincidence!
Despite Mrs. White's bold denial, there is evidence that Mrs. White, an avid reader, had plenty of opportunity to read the writings of Dr. Jackson prior to the publication of her own health writings.
The Whites did not visit Dr. Jackson's health institute until August of 1864. This was 14 months after Mrs. White was said to have received her June, 1863, vision on health reform.17 She claimed to be unfamiliar with the writings of Dr. Jackson prior to September, 1863. However, the White boys had become ill with Diphtheria in January of 1863, and at that time, the Whites were first familiarized with the writings of Dr. Jackson. Grandson Arthur White tells of their good fortune:
"Fortunately--in the providence of God, no doubt--there had come into their hands, probably through an 'exchange' of papers at the Review office, either the Yates County Chronicle, of Penn Yan, New York, or some journal quoting from it, an extended article entitled 'Diphtheria, Its Causes, Treatment and Cure.' It was written by Dr. James C. Jackson, of Dansville, New York."18
Thus we know that the Whites had read at least one article of Dr. Jackson's at least four months prior to the date of the "vision." In fact, James reprinted Jackson's article on Diphtheria in the February 17, 1863, edition of the Review and Herald.
On August 13, 1863, one month before James supposedly had any knowledge of Dansville, Dr. Jackson wrote him apologizing for his long delay in replying to James' request for information about his books. It appears that James had written Jackson sometime in June, for in December of 1864, he stated that eighteen months earlier (June 1863) he had sent off to Dansville for some of their books.
When the books finally arrived, Mrs. White claimed they remained in the wrappers, but on December 12, 1863, James was mailing Jackson's Consumption from Topsham to a friend, Ira Abbey, in Brookfield, New York. It appears those wrappers came off those books at least nine months prior to Mrs. White writing out her vision! Furthermore, it is likely Ellen White read the article James White printed from Jackson's Laws of Life in the October 27 issue of the Review and Herald.19 Thus we can see that Mrs. White had plenty of opportunity to read the writings of Dr. Jackson prior to the publication of her own articles on health.
You decide: Was it God or Dr. Jackson?
Questions to ponder:
1. David Gilbert, "Dansville's 'Castle on the Hill'", Dansville Area Historical Society.
3. James C. Jackson, How to Treat the Sick Without Medicine (Dansville, NY: Austin, Jackson & Co., 1872), 26-235.
4. Ellen White, Letter 3, 1865. (To Edson and Willie White, June 13, 1865, Manuscript Releases, vol. 5, p. 384).
5. Ellen White, Second Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, October 8, 1867.
6. Ellen White, Testimonies, vol. 1, p. 421. In 1859, Ellen disdained getting involved in dress reform, claiming she had a vision showing its unimportance: "I was shown that the churches in Vermont have been weakened by leaving the important truth to dwell on little things--to dwell on articles of dress and take notice of little things. ... They neglect the great principles of our faith to descend to little particulars. ...leave the brother or sister to the Lord and the angels to convict them of their wrong in dress or furniture or fixings." (Ellen White, Manuscript 1a, 1859) Many of her later writings on dress reform would lead one to believe dress reform, contrary to her "vision", was not a "little thing" after all.
7. H.E. Carver, Hope of Israel vol. 2, no. 6, Aug. 27, 1867, p. 47.
8. Ellen White, Testimonies, vol. 1, p. 525.
9. Review and Herald vol. 29, Feb. 5, 1867, p. 102.
10. Arthur White, Ellen G. White Volume 2 The Progressive Years 1862-1876, p. 78, 79.
11. James White, Op. cit. HL, No. 1, p. 12 in Ellen G. White Volume 2 The Progressive Years 1862-1876, page 83.
12. Ellen White, Manuscript Releases vol. 5, p. 402.
13. Ellen White, Temperance, p. 157.
14. Ellen White, Testimonies, vol. 1, p. 290, 296-297.
15. Ellen White, Letter 6, 1864, p. 1. (To Brother and Sister Lockwood, September, 1864.)
16. Ellen White, Manuscript 7, 1867. Manuscript Releases vol. 5, pp. 391, 392.
17. "It was at the house of Bro. A. Hilliard, at Otsego, Mich., June 6, 1863, that the great subject of health reform was opened before me in vision." (Review and Herald, Oct. 8, 1867).
18. Arthur White, Progressive Years, Vol. 2, p. 13.
19. J.C. Jackson, "Which Will You Have, Hoops or Health?", Review and Herald, Oct. 27, 1863.
20. H. E. Carver, "Mrs. E. G. White's Claims to Divine Inspiration Examined", 1872.